Code icon

The App is Under a Quick Maintenance

We apologize for the inconvenience. Please come back later

Menu iconMenu iconLa Biblia de Python y SQL: Desde principiante hasta experto mundial
La Biblia de Python y SQL: Desde principiante hasta experto mundial

Chapter 10: Python for Scientific Computing and Data Analysis

10.8 Introduction to TensorFlow and PyTorch

TensorFlow and PyTorch are two of the most widely used and popular libraries in the field of deep learning. They are known for their ability to handle complex computations and have robust support for various deep learning algorithms. Although both libraries have similarities, they differ in their philosophies and usability, which makes them unique.

TensorFlow, developed by the Google Brain team, provides one of the most comprehensive and flexible platforms for machine learning and deep learning. It offers multiple APIs, with TensorFlow Core being the lowest level, providing complete programming control. This feature makes it an ideal tool for machine learning researchers and other professionals who require fine levels of control over their models. TensorFlow is also an excellent choice for distributed computing, allowing portions of the graph to be computed on different GPUs/CPU cores.

Another advantage of TensorFlow is its TensorFlow Extended (TFX) platform, which is an end-to-end machine learning platform for building production-ready ML pipelines. This platform provides a set of TensorFlow libraries and tools that allow data scientists and developers to create, train, and deploy machine learning models at scale.

On the other hand, PyTorch, developed by Facebook's AI research team, is a dynamic neural network library that emphasizes simplicity and ease of use. PyTorch is an excellent choice for researchers, students, and other professionals who want to experiment with new ideas and concepts in deep learning without worrying too much about the technical details. PyTorch also offers a more pythonic way of building neural networks than TensorFlow.

In summary, both TensorFlow and PyTorch are excellent libraries for deep learning. While TensorFlow is more suitable for those who require fine levels of control over their models and prefer a more comprehensive and flexible platform, PyTorch is more suitable for those who want to experiment with new ideas and concepts in deep learning without worrying too much about the technical details.

Example:

Here is a simple example of using TensorFlow to create and train a simple linear model:

import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np

# Model parameters
W = tf.Variable([.3], dtype=tf.float32)
b = tf.Variable([-.3], dtype=tf.float32)

# Model input and output
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)
linear_model = W * x + b
y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)

# Loss
loss = tf.reduce_sum(tf.square(linear_model - y))

# Optimizer
optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01)
train = optimizer.minimize(loss)

# Training data
x_train = [1, 2, 3, 4]
y_train = [0, -1, -2, -3]

# Training loop
init = tf.global_variables_initializer()
sess = tf.Session()
sess.run(init)
for i in range(1000):
    sess.run(train, {x: x_train, y: y_train})

# Evaluate training accuracy
curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss = sess.run([W, b, loss], {x: x_train, y: y_train})
print("W: %s b: %s loss: %s"%(curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss))

On the other hand, PyTorch, backed by Facebook's AI Research lab, places a higher priority on user control and as such is more flexible. Unlike TensorFlow's static graph paradigm, PyTorch uses a dynamic graph paradigm that allows for more flexibility in building complex architectures. This feature makes PyTorch easier to learn and lighter to use, and it provides Pythonic capabilities such as the ability to debug models in real time.

Here's a similar example in PyTorch:

import torch
from torch.autograd import Variable

# N is batch size; D_in is input dimension;
# H is hidden dimension; D_out is output dimension.
N, D_in, H, D_out = 64, 1000, 100, 10

# Create random Tensors to hold inputs and outputs, and wrap them in Variables.
x = Variable(torch.randn(N, D_in))
y = Variable(torch.randn(N, D_out), requires_grad=False)

# Use the nn package to define our model and loss function.
model = torch.nn.Sequential(
    torch.nn.Linear(D_in, H),
    torch.nn.ReLU(),
    torch.nn.Linear(H, D_out),
)
loss_fn = torch.nn.MSELoss(size_average=False)

# Use the optim package to define an Optimizer that will update the weights of
# the model for us.
learning_rate = 1e-4
optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=learning_rate)

# Training loop
for t in range(500):
    # Forward pass
    y_pred = model(x)

    # Compute and print loss
    loss = loss_fn(y_pred, y)
    print(t, loss.data[0])

    # Zero gradients, perform a backward pass,

 and update the weights.
    optimizer.zero_grad()
    loss.backward()
    optimizer.step()

Both TensorFlow and PyTorch are excellent choices for deep learning and largely come down to personal preference. If you plan to perform a lot of scientific computations, you might find TensorFlow more user-friendly. However, if you're new to deep learning or prefer a more straightforward way of doing things, then PyTorch may be the better option.

These libraries extend Python's capabilities into the realm of data science, machine learning, and deep learning, adding to the reasons why Python is such a popular language in scientific computing. In the next section, we will focus on practical exercises to help you become more familiar with these libraries.

10.8 Introduction to TensorFlow and PyTorch

TensorFlow and PyTorch are two of the most widely used and popular libraries in the field of deep learning. They are known for their ability to handle complex computations and have robust support for various deep learning algorithms. Although both libraries have similarities, they differ in their philosophies and usability, which makes them unique.

TensorFlow, developed by the Google Brain team, provides one of the most comprehensive and flexible platforms for machine learning and deep learning. It offers multiple APIs, with TensorFlow Core being the lowest level, providing complete programming control. This feature makes it an ideal tool for machine learning researchers and other professionals who require fine levels of control over their models. TensorFlow is also an excellent choice for distributed computing, allowing portions of the graph to be computed on different GPUs/CPU cores.

Another advantage of TensorFlow is its TensorFlow Extended (TFX) platform, which is an end-to-end machine learning platform for building production-ready ML pipelines. This platform provides a set of TensorFlow libraries and tools that allow data scientists and developers to create, train, and deploy machine learning models at scale.

On the other hand, PyTorch, developed by Facebook's AI research team, is a dynamic neural network library that emphasizes simplicity and ease of use. PyTorch is an excellent choice for researchers, students, and other professionals who want to experiment with new ideas and concepts in deep learning without worrying too much about the technical details. PyTorch also offers a more pythonic way of building neural networks than TensorFlow.

In summary, both TensorFlow and PyTorch are excellent libraries for deep learning. While TensorFlow is more suitable for those who require fine levels of control over their models and prefer a more comprehensive and flexible platform, PyTorch is more suitable for those who want to experiment with new ideas and concepts in deep learning without worrying too much about the technical details.

Example:

Here is a simple example of using TensorFlow to create and train a simple linear model:

import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np

# Model parameters
W = tf.Variable([.3], dtype=tf.float32)
b = tf.Variable([-.3], dtype=tf.float32)

# Model input and output
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)
linear_model = W * x + b
y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)

# Loss
loss = tf.reduce_sum(tf.square(linear_model - y))

# Optimizer
optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01)
train = optimizer.minimize(loss)

# Training data
x_train = [1, 2, 3, 4]
y_train = [0, -1, -2, -3]

# Training loop
init = tf.global_variables_initializer()
sess = tf.Session()
sess.run(init)
for i in range(1000):
    sess.run(train, {x: x_train, y: y_train})

# Evaluate training accuracy
curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss = sess.run([W, b, loss], {x: x_train, y: y_train})
print("W: %s b: %s loss: %s"%(curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss))

On the other hand, PyTorch, backed by Facebook's AI Research lab, places a higher priority on user control and as such is more flexible. Unlike TensorFlow's static graph paradigm, PyTorch uses a dynamic graph paradigm that allows for more flexibility in building complex architectures. This feature makes PyTorch easier to learn and lighter to use, and it provides Pythonic capabilities such as the ability to debug models in real time.

Here's a similar example in PyTorch:

import torch
from torch.autograd import Variable

# N is batch size; D_in is input dimension;
# H is hidden dimension; D_out is output dimension.
N, D_in, H, D_out = 64, 1000, 100, 10

# Create random Tensors to hold inputs and outputs, and wrap them in Variables.
x = Variable(torch.randn(N, D_in))
y = Variable(torch.randn(N, D_out), requires_grad=False)

# Use the nn package to define our model and loss function.
model = torch.nn.Sequential(
    torch.nn.Linear(D_in, H),
    torch.nn.ReLU(),
    torch.nn.Linear(H, D_out),
)
loss_fn = torch.nn.MSELoss(size_average=False)

# Use the optim package to define an Optimizer that will update the weights of
# the model for us.
learning_rate = 1e-4
optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=learning_rate)

# Training loop
for t in range(500):
    # Forward pass
    y_pred = model(x)

    # Compute and print loss
    loss = loss_fn(y_pred, y)
    print(t, loss.data[0])

    # Zero gradients, perform a backward pass,

 and update the weights.
    optimizer.zero_grad()
    loss.backward()
    optimizer.step()

Both TensorFlow and PyTorch are excellent choices for deep learning and largely come down to personal preference. If you plan to perform a lot of scientific computations, you might find TensorFlow more user-friendly. However, if you're new to deep learning or prefer a more straightforward way of doing things, then PyTorch may be the better option.

These libraries extend Python's capabilities into the realm of data science, machine learning, and deep learning, adding to the reasons why Python is such a popular language in scientific computing. In the next section, we will focus on practical exercises to help you become more familiar with these libraries.

10.8 Introduction to TensorFlow and PyTorch

TensorFlow and PyTorch are two of the most widely used and popular libraries in the field of deep learning. They are known for their ability to handle complex computations and have robust support for various deep learning algorithms. Although both libraries have similarities, they differ in their philosophies and usability, which makes them unique.

TensorFlow, developed by the Google Brain team, provides one of the most comprehensive and flexible platforms for machine learning and deep learning. It offers multiple APIs, with TensorFlow Core being the lowest level, providing complete programming control. This feature makes it an ideal tool for machine learning researchers and other professionals who require fine levels of control over their models. TensorFlow is also an excellent choice for distributed computing, allowing portions of the graph to be computed on different GPUs/CPU cores.

Another advantage of TensorFlow is its TensorFlow Extended (TFX) platform, which is an end-to-end machine learning platform for building production-ready ML pipelines. This platform provides a set of TensorFlow libraries and tools that allow data scientists and developers to create, train, and deploy machine learning models at scale.

On the other hand, PyTorch, developed by Facebook's AI research team, is a dynamic neural network library that emphasizes simplicity and ease of use. PyTorch is an excellent choice for researchers, students, and other professionals who want to experiment with new ideas and concepts in deep learning without worrying too much about the technical details. PyTorch also offers a more pythonic way of building neural networks than TensorFlow.

In summary, both TensorFlow and PyTorch are excellent libraries for deep learning. While TensorFlow is more suitable for those who require fine levels of control over their models and prefer a more comprehensive and flexible platform, PyTorch is more suitable for those who want to experiment with new ideas and concepts in deep learning without worrying too much about the technical details.

Example:

Here is a simple example of using TensorFlow to create and train a simple linear model:

import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np

# Model parameters
W = tf.Variable([.3], dtype=tf.float32)
b = tf.Variable([-.3], dtype=tf.float32)

# Model input and output
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)
linear_model = W * x + b
y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)

# Loss
loss = tf.reduce_sum(tf.square(linear_model - y))

# Optimizer
optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01)
train = optimizer.minimize(loss)

# Training data
x_train = [1, 2, 3, 4]
y_train = [0, -1, -2, -3]

# Training loop
init = tf.global_variables_initializer()
sess = tf.Session()
sess.run(init)
for i in range(1000):
    sess.run(train, {x: x_train, y: y_train})

# Evaluate training accuracy
curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss = sess.run([W, b, loss], {x: x_train, y: y_train})
print("W: %s b: %s loss: %s"%(curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss))

On the other hand, PyTorch, backed by Facebook's AI Research lab, places a higher priority on user control and as such is more flexible. Unlike TensorFlow's static graph paradigm, PyTorch uses a dynamic graph paradigm that allows for more flexibility in building complex architectures. This feature makes PyTorch easier to learn and lighter to use, and it provides Pythonic capabilities such as the ability to debug models in real time.

Here's a similar example in PyTorch:

import torch
from torch.autograd import Variable

# N is batch size; D_in is input dimension;
# H is hidden dimension; D_out is output dimension.
N, D_in, H, D_out = 64, 1000, 100, 10

# Create random Tensors to hold inputs and outputs, and wrap them in Variables.
x = Variable(torch.randn(N, D_in))
y = Variable(torch.randn(N, D_out), requires_grad=False)

# Use the nn package to define our model and loss function.
model = torch.nn.Sequential(
    torch.nn.Linear(D_in, H),
    torch.nn.ReLU(),
    torch.nn.Linear(H, D_out),
)
loss_fn = torch.nn.MSELoss(size_average=False)

# Use the optim package to define an Optimizer that will update the weights of
# the model for us.
learning_rate = 1e-4
optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=learning_rate)

# Training loop
for t in range(500):
    # Forward pass
    y_pred = model(x)

    # Compute and print loss
    loss = loss_fn(y_pred, y)
    print(t, loss.data[0])

    # Zero gradients, perform a backward pass,

 and update the weights.
    optimizer.zero_grad()
    loss.backward()
    optimizer.step()

Both TensorFlow and PyTorch are excellent choices for deep learning and largely come down to personal preference. If you plan to perform a lot of scientific computations, you might find TensorFlow more user-friendly. However, if you're new to deep learning or prefer a more straightforward way of doing things, then PyTorch may be the better option.

These libraries extend Python's capabilities into the realm of data science, machine learning, and deep learning, adding to the reasons why Python is such a popular language in scientific computing. In the next section, we will focus on practical exercises to help you become more familiar with these libraries.

10.8 Introduction to TensorFlow and PyTorch

TensorFlow and PyTorch are two of the most widely used and popular libraries in the field of deep learning. They are known for their ability to handle complex computations and have robust support for various deep learning algorithms. Although both libraries have similarities, they differ in their philosophies and usability, which makes them unique.

TensorFlow, developed by the Google Brain team, provides one of the most comprehensive and flexible platforms for machine learning and deep learning. It offers multiple APIs, with TensorFlow Core being the lowest level, providing complete programming control. This feature makes it an ideal tool for machine learning researchers and other professionals who require fine levels of control over their models. TensorFlow is also an excellent choice for distributed computing, allowing portions of the graph to be computed on different GPUs/CPU cores.

Another advantage of TensorFlow is its TensorFlow Extended (TFX) platform, which is an end-to-end machine learning platform for building production-ready ML pipelines. This platform provides a set of TensorFlow libraries and tools that allow data scientists and developers to create, train, and deploy machine learning models at scale.

On the other hand, PyTorch, developed by Facebook's AI research team, is a dynamic neural network library that emphasizes simplicity and ease of use. PyTorch is an excellent choice for researchers, students, and other professionals who want to experiment with new ideas and concepts in deep learning without worrying too much about the technical details. PyTorch also offers a more pythonic way of building neural networks than TensorFlow.

In summary, both TensorFlow and PyTorch are excellent libraries for deep learning. While TensorFlow is more suitable for those who require fine levels of control over their models and prefer a more comprehensive and flexible platform, PyTorch is more suitable for those who want to experiment with new ideas and concepts in deep learning without worrying too much about the technical details.

Example:

Here is a simple example of using TensorFlow to create and train a simple linear model:

import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np

# Model parameters
W = tf.Variable([.3], dtype=tf.float32)
b = tf.Variable([-.3], dtype=tf.float32)

# Model input and output
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)
linear_model = W * x + b
y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)

# Loss
loss = tf.reduce_sum(tf.square(linear_model - y))

# Optimizer
optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01)
train = optimizer.minimize(loss)

# Training data
x_train = [1, 2, 3, 4]
y_train = [0, -1, -2, -3]

# Training loop
init = tf.global_variables_initializer()
sess = tf.Session()
sess.run(init)
for i in range(1000):
    sess.run(train, {x: x_train, y: y_train})

# Evaluate training accuracy
curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss = sess.run([W, b, loss], {x: x_train, y: y_train})
print("W: %s b: %s loss: %s"%(curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss))

On the other hand, PyTorch, backed by Facebook's AI Research lab, places a higher priority on user control and as such is more flexible. Unlike TensorFlow's static graph paradigm, PyTorch uses a dynamic graph paradigm that allows for more flexibility in building complex architectures. This feature makes PyTorch easier to learn and lighter to use, and it provides Pythonic capabilities such as the ability to debug models in real time.

Here's a similar example in PyTorch:

import torch
from torch.autograd import Variable

# N is batch size; D_in is input dimension;
# H is hidden dimension; D_out is output dimension.
N, D_in, H, D_out = 64, 1000, 100, 10

# Create random Tensors to hold inputs and outputs, and wrap them in Variables.
x = Variable(torch.randn(N, D_in))
y = Variable(torch.randn(N, D_out), requires_grad=False)

# Use the nn package to define our model and loss function.
model = torch.nn.Sequential(
    torch.nn.Linear(D_in, H),
    torch.nn.ReLU(),
    torch.nn.Linear(H, D_out),
)
loss_fn = torch.nn.MSELoss(size_average=False)

# Use the optim package to define an Optimizer that will update the weights of
# the model for us.
learning_rate = 1e-4
optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=learning_rate)

# Training loop
for t in range(500):
    # Forward pass
    y_pred = model(x)

    # Compute and print loss
    loss = loss_fn(y_pred, y)
    print(t, loss.data[0])

    # Zero gradients, perform a backward pass,

 and update the weights.
    optimizer.zero_grad()
    loss.backward()
    optimizer.step()

Both TensorFlow and PyTorch are excellent choices for deep learning and largely come down to personal preference. If you plan to perform a lot of scientific computations, you might find TensorFlow more user-friendly. However, if you're new to deep learning or prefer a more straightforward way of doing things, then PyTorch may be the better option.

These libraries extend Python's capabilities into the realm of data science, machine learning, and deep learning, adding to the reasons why Python is such a popular language in scientific computing. In the next section, we will focus on practical exercises to help you become more familiar with these libraries.